Talk:Super Moon (album)

Requested move 11 August 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. Recentism being the main argument here, this could possibly be revisited in future based on WP:SMALLDETAILS, but not at this time. (closed by non-admin page mover) Steven   Crossin  Help resolve disputes! 15:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Super Moon (album) → Super Moon – no other page with this name having the "M" capitalized Jax 0677 (talk) 01:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak support per WP:SMALLDETAILS but add a hatnote and retain Super moon as a primary redirect to Supermoon. PC78 (talk) 09:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ...on the basis that the phenomenon is not something that would normally be capitalised. PC78 (talk) 10:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose and suggest that the Super Moon redirect be targeted to Supermoon, especially since there's already a hatnote. WP:RECENTISM, this album is recent, if it's still highly relevant in 6 months to the point that it's on part with an alternate spelling of the actual phenomenom, it can perhaps be moved then.  SnowFire (talk) 16:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose dubious new album stub vs super moon In ictu oculi (talk) 06:50, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose I agree this is a basic RECENTISM. "Super Moon" should remain a primary redirect to phenomenal Super moon as it was since 2011 before it was changed last week. – Ammarpad (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.