Talk:Super Punch-Out!!/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I can't see any major problem with the article. Perhaps some parts of it could be slighlty rewritten in order to avoid repetitions - in particular in "Reception" (repetition of "released") and "Gameplay" (repetition of "The player" / "The game", especially at the end). The gameplay section could also be shortened a bit, as the readers may not be interested in every single details of the gameplay. Other than that, I think it's a good article which fully covers the subject. Well done!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Too many repetitions in some sections, but overall it reads well.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Many different sources are used and they all seem reliable
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Broad in its coverage, but the gameplay section is actually a bit too detailed.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Both praises and criticisms are included in the Reception section
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: