Talk:Super Robot Wars XO/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

 * It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
 * It contains copyright infringements -
 * It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include,, or large numbers of , , or similar tags. (See also ). -
 * It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Lede

 * Part of the company's Super Robot Wars series - better would be to say which entry in the Super Robot Wars series it is. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I had considered doing that while writing this. Ultimately, I chose not to, as there's an incredible amount of Super Robot Wars games that writing something like "The twenty-sixth installment" didn't sit well with me.
 * is Super Robot Wars GC not notable? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Probably not. Frankly I haven't done an in-depth search like I did with this game, but all I could find at first glance was a GameSpot preview. I will consider making a page if there's more coverage.
 * They aren't "installments", they are games in a series. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've seen the word "installments" be used many times to discuss an entry in a game series, so I don't think it's necessarily incorrect. I can still change it if you insist it doesn't belong there. Namcokid  47  23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * increased hardware capabilities and online support - increased from what? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

General

 * is it a "fleet of mechas" as per lede, or "fleet of mecha" in body? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Could we get some ALTtext? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's "fleet of mechas". I made a typo.
 * Super Robot Wars GC (2004) - expand "released in 2004" for example. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * pilot cut-in animations - probably "additional animations" would suffice. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * "a different flavor" - if this is a quote, who said it. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Removed the quote and just said they wanted it to be different from the usual style of the series.
 * "The Scrap Heap", any reason for title case? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Defined that it is the collective title she gave to the worst games.
 * I feel this article needs a bit more notes on how it sold in comparrison to the original game. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Added that it sold significantly less than GC.

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 15:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Adressed your comments. Namcokid  47  23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)