Talk:Superforecaster

Removal of Template:More citations needed
I'm going to remove this as in my opinion it is very misleading for an article that is reasonably fully cited as it is a WP:VAGUEWAVE. While its technically within the scope of the use of the template when most content is cited it is far better to cited individual sections: While I personally think at the time of this post the lede and Etomology section do not need citing I accept others may take a different view may wish to use e.g. Template:fact which is more precise at the problem areas. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Merging
To state the nearly obvious in case anyone believes they have a possibly non-contentious merge it I am almost certain to contend it, see WP:MERGEPROP but obviously will respect consensus. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

New references and things
One of the key things superforecasters were hailed as good at was predicting pandemics, and I'm far from sure superforecasters have had a good covid-19 but I'm we need WP:RS to avalyze that. The following time magazine article by Tara Law may have some content usable in the article in it; but use needs to be clear. The article also leads to Good Judgement open and Metaculus. . These are recorded for possible later article improvement. Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)