Talk:Superman: Ultimate Flight/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 23:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for the review. Themeparkgc   Talk  23:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for the review. Themeparkgc   Talk  23:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for the review. Themeparkgc   Talk  23:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * "The ride at Six Flags Great America ultimately opened on May 3, 2003" - Is the word "ultimately" really needed?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Themeparkgc  Talk  06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * "The 2003 versions differ slightly from the original in Georgia; however, the majority of the layout remains the same." - Should this really be in the 'History' section? Sounds more suitable for the 'Characteristic' section as it already is so maybe just remove this statement?.- Dom497 ( talk ) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Themeparkgc  Talk  06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Ref 17 is redirecting.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Themeparkgc  Talk  06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * "...the on-ride camera photographs them." - Ref?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Themeparkgc  Talk  06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Any awards? I would check but I got no time (I know, it sounds like an excuse but its not).-- Dom497 ( talk ) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Themeparkgc  Talk  06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ I don't think it won any awards as such but I have added some rankings from the Golden Ticket Awards and Best Roller Coaster Poll. Themeparkgc   Talk  06:44, 20 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Just a small pet peeve of mine...in the ref section, some have it dd-mm-yyyy while others have mm-dd-yyyy. Maybe pick one format to make them consistent?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Themeparkgc  Talk  04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Does there really have to be external links to RCDB when they are already refs?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I think the duplication of the links certainly serves a purpose here. I think it helps supplement having just three official websites there and provides a bit more balance. Themeparkgc   Talk  04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * This is more of a question from me to you as it was brought up in the SheiKra FA review: Should the Amusement Today refs use the cite journal template rather than the cite web?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Since Amusement Today is a periodical, then it should use cite journal, shouldn't it? The article currently uses this template. Themeparkgc   Talk  04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. Wasn't really part of this review, just a question I had for you. :P -- Dom497 ( talk ) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

This should be it. Good job!.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)