Talk:Supermarine Sea King/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 03:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I would integrate note 1 into the text.
 * Done. AM


 * "A unique feature of the Sea King II was a tube that ran through the hull to supply air to the 'rear step'" What "rear step"?
 * Explanation given. AM


 * Lead says "probably", body says "the aircraft exhibited was a modified N60 Baby". Be consistent
 * Sorted. AM


 * "240 horsepower (180 kW) Siddeley Puma engine" this is not cited anywhere
 * Cited. AM


 * What is the basis of CC licensing for the archive.org images? Since it's a UK publication I expect both UK and US public domain tags would be necessary (probably PD-UK-unknown and PD-1923).
 * Tags added. AM

(t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:48, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

I've checked a few of the sources and did not find any close paraphrasing, failed verification, or OR issues. The only outstanding issue is image licensing (t &#183; c)  buidhe  09:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, the licensing issue seems to be sorted now. Although, for future reference I would not advise changing the licensing of images that already have OTRS permissions, or leaving contradictory information about the licensing status, I fixed these issues myself. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  10:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, Buidhe. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)