Talk:Supermarine Seamew/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 23:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  23:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Design and development

 * Put a space between R. and J. (in the infobox and lead too)
 * Done. AM


 * Why was he preparing drawings, were they ordered by the Air Ministry?
 * Supermarine sometimes submitted ideas as drawings, the ones for the Seamew were accepted by the Air Ministry. Text amended to clarify this. Amitchell125 (talk) 06:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Replace the period after "a crew of three" with a semicolon and lowercase the succeeding "The"
 * Done. AM


 * When was the aircraft named Seamew?
 * When the contract was awarded, text amended. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Remove the comma after "radial engines"
 * Done. AM


 * Combine paragraphs 3 and 4 together
 * Done. AM


 * "scaled-down version of the Southampton" link Southampton here and delink it in the next paragraph
 * Done. AM


 * "height of 13 ft 1" is this supposed to mean 13 ft 1 in?
 * Sorted. AM


 * Remove "in earnest"
 * Done. AM

Testing and operational history

 * "in March 1930" capitalize "In"
 * Done. AM

Overall

 * Neutral
 * Broad and focused
 * No war edits
 * Image properly licensed
 * Sources ok

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:


 * I've left some comments. PizzaKing13   ¡Hablame!  23:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * above comments done. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good. Well done, I'll pass this review. PizzaKing13   ¡Hablame!  19:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)