Talk:Supersonic Low Altitude Missile

Comments
Deleted phrase 'height of the Cold War' as this is a meaningless term which can be applied to many points between 1947-1989 - 25 June 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.123.225.69 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Contradictory
Early in the article it states that the common belief that the vehicle itself would release so much radiation during normal flight operations that it could be considered a "secondary" weapons in and of itself was a "misconception" while later the article states the program was cancelled because, amongst other things, it was thought testing would be problematic because of the amount of radiation that would be released - which is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.91.48.16 (talk) 13:25, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Not&mdash; please, try an actual moment of reflexion upon the subject and the context, a flight to target would be a one-time and unique path with perishing small transitory exposure to any one point upon the ground below, it’s not a loitering drone, whereas, a test facility of even a low number of limited test cycles would leave that land-based location a tad bit, uh, saturated.  WurmWoode  T   04:06, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * But both of the external links at the bottom of this article directly contradict the claims that the radiation from the vehicle itself wouldn't be dangerous. 173.226.63.104 (talk) 18:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)