Talk:Supinya Klangnarong

Untitled
I'm not familiar with the case, but I made some grammatical changes to the page. The only substantive change was to delete a sentence that seemed unnecessary: "It should be noted that the court has never endorsed the content of Supinya's interview, i.e., it is wrong to presume that her interview was reasonable." The description of the circumstances surrounding the withdrawal of the case seems to be clear enough without the sentence, and it is somewhat confusing grammatically. Skno5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC).

Vague disparaging innuendo language cut
Eliminated the following on grounds of being vague, disparaging and violating neutral point of view. Article also suffers from severe lack of citations.

"In the path of struggle against the elected Prime Minister of Thailand,... "

"..., and accordingly, was allegedly a part of the pro-coup activists in Thailand."

Fernquestjon (talk) 11:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)