Talk:Supper at Emmaus

Page Topic
It seems to me that this page is about the art describing the Biblical account. In fact the page refers to cycles of the Life of Christ which is an artistic topic. If so, it should somehow be declared as an art-oriented page upfront, not be confused with one of the pages that describe the "episodes in the life of Jesus" from a Biblical standpoint, e.g. Empty tomb or Myrrhbearers. Whoever watches this page, please have a go at it, else I will do it in a while. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 14:11, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That is just because not much has been added on the purely religious side; I can't believe there is not much more to be said. The article contains the gospel account basics, & I can't see any point in splitting such a short stub, or leaving just a gap on the religious side. The typical format is to have a "religious" section first, & then the art. Johnbod (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Dividing the episode from its illustrations is not an encyclopedic treatment. Dividing each subject into the smallest possible scintilla strips the resulting fragments of cultural meaning. And its cultural meaning is perhaps the only reality of this trope.--Wetman (talk) 06:39, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Actually, the philosophy of hypertext is that of bite-sized presentations that all clearly link to each other, rather than the old style 12 volume encyclopedias that use dto be carried by salesmen door to door. In any case, I support making the supper a sub-article of the appearance, since the appearance has two parts, road then supper. History2007 (talk) 07:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)