Talk:Supplemental instruction

C-Class and Low-important characterization
The article has been reworked according to guidance provided by the template that flagged problems with references. Many more references have been added to Journals, newspaper articles, books and other materials. Also, I have added several new sections, including a "Criticism" section.

Regarding low-importance, supplemental instruction has been adopted by hundreds of institutions on several continents. "Low-importance" is a mischaracterization of SI. Even the original article had enough information in it to make me wonder why someone assigned that rating. I'd like to know what higher-education programs that are deemed important by that editor or those editors. Mbaugher (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)