Talk:Supreme Court Historical Society

very skimpy
Please, provide information as to what this lot is up to; inquiring minds want to know. 172.75.173.194 (talk) 03:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

See-alsos unrelated to Supreme Court Historical Society
The Controversies section has see also links to Presidency of Donald Trump and Clinton Foundation. I don't see any documented connections. The edit summary which added these is linking to two other similar ethics controversies. Which seems odd to me. Absent any connection to the linked see-also articles, why not link to a thousand other influence controversies?

I'm inclined to remove these, as well as the complementary set of see-also links added to the Clinton Foundation article.

But even though I am quibbling about these links, a shout-out to who did so much good work on this article. -- M.boli (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @M.boli - thanks for the shoutout and I'm curious to hear what others think. I first looked for an article that gives an overview of these types of conflict-of-interest controversies (accepting donations or doing business as a prominent elected official) and ideally there's a generic article destination that would help avoid the arbitrariness of picking out examples, when there are countless others (though maybe not as prominent of examples in modern American politics) Superb Owl (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)