Talk:Suprobhat Bangladesh

PROD challenge
I am challenging the PROD rationale, it is a notable secondary newspaper of Bangladesh. We have an essay WP:INDAFD. It is mainly written for Indian articles, but, applicable here too. Also note, the article was created by a sock, which might be a reason to delete. But, PROD contested. You may wish to take it to AFD. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 22:54, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Tito ☸ Dutta 22:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Though it might be notable, as it stands now, it doesn't appear notable. If that can be fixed, the article can be kept. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * , you should not nominate an article for deletion (specially when your concern is "notability") only on the basis of condition of the current version. Consider following WP:BEFORE. I don't think I am going to make much change in the article. I'll try to show it passes #1, #2, #4 of Newspaper notability requirements. And that is more an AFD argument. But, if you take it to AFD, actually I have to repeat my arguments there. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 23:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If you think you can make it meet those criteria, go ahead and remove the PROD and do so. I'll check back in a few days to see if it still merits deletion, and if so, I'll AfD it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * yes, you are right, actually I should have removed the template. But, I generally prefer removing templates myself and allow others to discuss. . -- Tito ☸ Dutta 23:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)