Talk:Surat/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ComputerJA (talk · contribs) 15:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy fail
I am going to have to fail this nomination. There are entire paragraphs and sections that are unsourced, which makes me wonder if the information is original research. Sections like History, Geography, Finance and economy, Government and politics, Municipal institutions, Transport, Infrastructure, Demographics, Culture, food and festivals, Media, Education, Points of interest, have paragraphs that do not have a single source. They are also very short paragraphs, so it is difficult to keep up per WP:LAYOUT. The introduction does not adequately summarize the information per WP:LEAD. In addition, some of the sources are good while others are incomplete (i.e. missing the publisher/author; lacking a date; etc.). I'd love to see this article worked and nominated again when it's ready. Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. I'd be more than happy to take a look at it again and help you get this promoted if possible. ComputerJA ( ☎  •  ✎  ) 15:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)