Talk:Surveillance of Julian Assange

Not Neutral
This whole page literally reads like a conspiracy-fueled rant lifted directly from the Assange Defense team. It's filled with nothing but dubious sources, and links to articles by hardcore Assange suuporters asserting claims with no actual evidence, just supposition, and conclusion-jumping. 2600:6C5A:67F:ED90:7DEF:31F:86C2:11B4 (talk) 00:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


 * what sources do you have a problem with? CNN? El Pais? Associated Press? Reuters? Be specific
 * just supposition, and conclusion-jumping. like what? Softlemonades (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The zero problems identified in the complaint have been fixed using zero edits and therefore the tag has been removed. NadVolum (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Undue weight tag
What part of the sentence do you believe has undue weight? Burrobert (talk) 03:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Shes guessing about the future and things shes not an expert in Softlem (talk) 08:19, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * There are two parts to the sentence. She predicts that the surveillance "could be used in support of the extradition case". She also says that "the surveillance was conducted on behalf of the US government". She is not a lawyer so the first part may be problematic, although it is not a controversial statement. It is reasonable for a journalist to conclude that "the surveillance was conducted on behalf of the US government" based on their research. Seymour Hersh, for example, recently concluded that the U.S. blew up the Nord Stream 2 pipeline based on information he received. Burrobert (talk) 11:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Youre right and Im okay with the part that she thinks "the surveillance was conducted on behalf of the US government" Softlem (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Text about rulings by court on CIA actions
I have started a discussion at Talk:Julian Assange involving recent edit revert and readd here  where the old version is used at Julian Assange. NadVolum (talk) 00:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The reinsertion here needs to be removed now. SPECIFICO talk 02:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I have replied in the section you started on the Julian Assange talkpage. Burrobert (talk) 04:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * SPECIFICO expain? Softlem (talk) 10:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)