Talk:Survivor: All-Stars/Archive 1

incomplete page
where are the results of the reward and immunity challeges in the all-star season of survivor??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jupnaptmecha (talk • contribs)


 * Well, I suppose they are not on the page! If you have (or anyone else, for that matter), the DVD of the season it would be nice if you could get the table up.  THE  DARK LORD TROMBONATOR  ( ( (¶) ) )  03:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I have gotten through the first eleven episodes. I will add some more results tomorrow. The rest of them should actually be up before 5pm tomorrow. Because the reward challenge in Ep 11 is indivdual and their is no merge color, I will be using black. Feel free to change it to a different color other than blue if you all would like. Why was there no results table in the first place?

User:ScottAHudson


 * Likely ASS aired before WP was popular and thus fell to the lack of consistency in episodes. --Masem 01:03, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "lack of consistency"? Just wondering! ScottAHudson 15:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That basically, unlike now where we have at least 4 seasons that I'm aware of that we've developed the page during the run of the show and used the same format each subsequent time, that for the earlier seasons, someone just made up a table roughly based on the format, but to do a complete version of the page would take a lot of excessive time and effort, as well as having access to the show itself to verify details. It's not that we can't go back and make the older seasons consistent, but it doesn't help that we don't have all those seasons on DVD to get the same level of detail as we can easily do when the new show airs and we can Tivo things back and forth. --Masem 15:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The game table is now complete. Have a look at it and address anything that might need to be changed in this talk page. I finished it around the afternoon yesterday. Got it done in two days.ScottAHudson 20:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Scott. It has really improved the page. I have now made the notes go small with but it would be great if you could link the numbers to their explanations (I'd do it but I don't know how!).  THE  DARK LORD TROMBONATOR  ( ( (¶) ) )  00:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Survallstarlogo.jpg
Image:Survallstarlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Consistencies
The contestants table is a bit bunched up, with taking up four to five lines each. Aesthetically, it's not pleasing. I fully expect to get a reply along the lines of "it's your monitor's fault", as has been given to others (I've been on the other side), but I notice that this table has a column that says which former season the contestants were on. To keep it consistent with Micronesia's table and to remove the excess column, we could put this information in the name column. Just a suggestion. Any thoughts? -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR  01:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good idea. I know on my monitor (I have the text size on a large setting), all the tables are much much larger than they would appear on the medium font setting, but thats the way I like it, so the size issue doesn't bother me. But another Game Table inconsistency I would like to comment on is in the "Previous Finish" column. I mean, why are some players listed as "Final #" while others are listed as "Eliminated #th"? Why Don't we just list "Final #" for everyone or "Eliminated #th" for everyone? MarkMc1990 (talk) 07:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

episode summaries
can eveyone pitch in an write an episode summary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.251.170 (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

New contestants table proposal
I wanted to create a new "Contestants" table for Survivor pages. I wanted the new one to be like this:


 * The Votes received column is the number of votes a castaway has received during Tribal Council at the time of their elimination. Bold denotes the votes received during the final Tribal Council.

You are free to post any complaints about this new format!

Lamp301 (talk) 03:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Like I said on Talk:Survivor: Africa; I prefer the cells as separate cells, with the exception of the merged tribe. It just looks cleaner separate. In addition, including the number of jury votes in the contestants table would be confusing. Most winners have received votes against them during the game. I don't mind the idea of putting previous finishes, however for seasons like Heroes vs. Villains with three-time contestants, it would clutter the table. -- Meag h a n ) ≈ 13:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Meaghan. The split cells are better than the merged cells should be regarded as two new tribes being formed with the same names, rather than a few people changing sides. The jury votes should not be put on this table, because that is confusing. And I echo Meaghan's sentiment about the previous seasons. Thanks for your proposal anyway :) &mdash; tdl trom bonator   01:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Um the vots for some contestnts are screwed up on here. Jenna is the one with three votes. Rob recivd one vote. Colby also recived another vote at the previous tribal counciel he was in making his total 4. So i would advise you to watch the season again to fix up your research.MrInhibitor (talk) 04:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Article Vandilism?
Ok I'm looking at episode 6, where Sue quit, and it says that Sue had an argument with Hatch about the rubbing thing. However Hatch was voted out in the previous episode. The episode description seems to say Hatch is still there. Also a bit of episode 7 says Hatch is still there. So somebody changed actual events. Anyone else agree on this?MrInhibitor (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Also check near the bottom at the voting colum. Someone has switched Colby and Hatch's names. So now we possibly need to check the whole thing now for vandilism.MrInhibitor (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

So some of the problems has been fixed namly colby and hatch's names being put in the right spots, but there's still sevrel mentions of Richard still being there after he was supposidly voted off. Hatch was voted out at the end of the fifth episode, but the sixth and seventh episodes still show clues that he was still there and he wasn't. So some of this still needs to be fixed. I haven't seen this season of Survivor in a long time which is why i'm not fixing it myself. So I hope someone will notice this and fix the problem. It seems like this has been going on for a while according to the revision history here. So let's get this fixed and possibly try to prevent this from happing in the future like limiting edit's on here to people with user names if possible. I just want the actual events put on here. I hope you know where I going and that someone will fix the problem and replay that they've notived the same problems. MrInhibitor (talk) 03:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm finding it strange that throughout the episodes beyond episode 5, where Hatch was voted out, that 'Richard' is constantly referred to. This article is incorrect and lacking references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.122.207 (talk) 13:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)