Talk:Survivor Series (1992)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I am reviewing your article for GA and will be adding comments below. I am reading through the article and have copy edited a few things in order for it to make more sense to me. Hope you don't mind. If so, let me know. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * "According to WWF storylines, Samoans have thick skulls" - what does Samoans mean in this context?
 * I am struggling with all the names and plots but I guess there is no way to make that easier for the reader!

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 22:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * "Samoans" just refers to people from Samoa. However, I can see that, since I didn't clarify that The Headshrinkers are from Samoa (and since their manager used to be part of a tag team names The Samoans), it wouldn't make a lot of sense without clarification. Does it work now? GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Is there a simple explanation for what "tag in" means?
 * Also, in the beginning of the article, you regularly say "the Bossman", but I notice as you get into describing the matches you call him "Bossman".
 * Is there a definition of "buyrate"?

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 23:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

The few issues I raise above, I know you will take care of appropriately and they don not prevent this article from passing as a GA. &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 00:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Congradulations! Another GA for you!
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Very well written b (MoS): Follows MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Necessary statements are referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The references are to reliable sources.  c (OR):  There is no OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Sets the context b (focused): Remains focused on article subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 00:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)