Talk:Survivor Series (1993)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I will be reviewing this article for GA. I feel that I cut my teeth on the first wrestling article of yours and will have much less trouble with this one. All in all, it looks very good.
 * Sorry I wikilinked kayfabe in your article. Even though I did a search, I did not find that you had already linked it above. It may not be harmful to have some of these obscure (to me) wrestling terms wikilinked more than once.
 * Makes sense, instead of expecting the reader to go back to find the wikilink. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I am wondering if sharpshooter should be capitalized as in the body of the article it is capitalized, but in the chart below it is not.
 * It is always capitalized on the WWE website, so I capitalized it in the chart. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should mention in the lead that this was thought to be the most boring wrestling event ever, as that seems distinctive.
 * I added some information about the reception. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I will add more comments after I read through it more. &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 23:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * "writing for 411mania.com" - shouldn't the name of a website be in italics?
 * Done. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It might be helpful to shorten the size of some of the long paragraphs for readability. For example, the first paragraph under Background could be split in two.
 * I split up some of the longer paragraphs in the background section. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article. I look forward to any further comments or suggestions, as you have been very helpful with both articles. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Final GA review (see here for criteria)

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 23:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: