Talk:Susan Collins (artist)

Own words
Please rewrite the article in your own words. Thank you. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Inhabited content
I found the following listing at the British Library http://catalog.bl.uk/, and think it might be worth mentioning in the article.
 * Collins, Susan Alexis. Inhabited content : an exploration into the role of the viewer through the realisation of ’In conversation’ and other works. University of Reading, 2001.

When working on the biography of a British academic, it is often a good idea to use http://catalog.bl.uk/ to see what the academic has written. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 15:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

copyright
This user finds copyright paranoia disruptive. Artlondon 15:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

notability
Collins organised the Tate's first net art -- http://www.tate.org.uk/netart/tateinspace/

recent article http://www.ciac.ca/magazine/archives/no_25/entrevue.htm
 * As the article stands, I'm personally quite happy that notability has been asserted. I'd love to see more refs though.  I've tagged as many facts with the ciac ref as I can, but there's still one sentence that remains unreffed.  Can anyone help with the ref? Chovain 20:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issues
I noticed that the entire article is a copy of Susan Collins "Info" page at http://www.susan-collins.net/ (or http://ucl.ac.uk/slade/sac/info leads to the same page). Nominated for deleted becasue, looking at the above comments, it hasn't been improved in 5 years. Though Collins is not completely un-notable, it may not be worth the effort to try saving, unfortunately. Sionk (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Looking at the edit history we find the copyvio originated with this edit . I've reverted the article to the version it was before the copyvio. She seems to have some claim to notability so its not an automatic prod. There may be a case for deleting some of the revisions which are copyvio's.--Salix (talk): 00:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)