Talk:Susanna Ceccardi/Archive 1

POV?
I cannot debate against myself, so if somebody would like to tell me what is POV...--Alexmar983 (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I am not a specialist of biographies. The article seems OK to me. I will read it more carefully later on. --Checco (talk) 06:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Checco, User:Wololoo removed a sentence which I am quite sure was in some source when I wrote it (probably the one I cannot access), "rising star" is an expression I will never use myself nor in italian nor in English... it is however used again by a recent source, so it's not false. In any case, it's fine, we dont say she was a "rising star". He also suggested to remove the part where the news on the national TV is described. It's a detail in the source, I put it there because of the level of the source, but it can be removed. Feel free also to highlight what you think it is in the many sources and it is not there yet. I am very open... again, it's just complicated to debate against myself.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Meno25 since you assessed the article in January, do you see any NNPOV?--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

I have also informed the WP Italy here--Alexmar983 (talk) 18:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Next time that I will revise existing sources from national newspapers (maybe there will be some new book, but it takes more time to have those), I will refine the text but I need some feedback by that time.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:31, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

BTW, NYT of today, "rising star" again (ok it's from the article of May but it's a clear source)... I think it could be under certain aspect NNPOV itself to remove such definition since it is present in the sources, but somebody else can wait another unrelated source that states so.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC) i will add the source, it has the name of the partner.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

I can add her position about regional differences in the health system, as a controversial aspect, but it's in the footnote. Maybe there is something from other sources in the footnotes i can remove, I can check. You tell me.--Alexmar983 (talk) 19:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

The performance of the local elections in 2019 was not strong so we might have more critical sources now.--Alexmar983 (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Also this one.

I have informed another project and still no comment.--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

So no comment from the projects, in the meantime even ptwiki translated this article without the warning and they probably can understand the source in Italian. I still have few new sources to integrate but at this point I start to think the warning is excessive. Whatever problem is there, I am sure people can simply fix the few sentences where it appears. There is IMHO no sign of a major neutrality unbalance in this article.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Checco can I ask you a final comment if you have time? thank you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Considering that the tag was never motivated here or in the summary, I will remove it. I can remove few more lines, I have added new sources, which appeared in the meantime and were also more critical, but in general it was and it is a balanced article. Whatever is potentially NNPOV is nothing that a removal or change of few sentences cannot fix. Plus, nobody commented from the projects showing any critical aspects.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said, I am no specialist of biographies and I am sorry to tell you that I have very little time for Wikipedia lately, thus I have not read the article throughly yet. However, what I saw is OK. There are no special POV issues in my view. --Checco (talk) 05:48, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Checco thank you for your reply.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

I have removed the tag.--Alexmar983 (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)