Talk:Sushmita Ruj

What is impressive about this person to have a Wiki page?
Other than citations, there is nothing impressive about this researcher based on my research. If Wikipedia is to list everyone that has some citation, then every academic should have a page. This page looks more like self-promotion as much more senior and cited researchers do not have a Wiki page. There should be significant work by an academic to have a Wiki page. This page should be deleted, or the criteria for having a Wiki page should be clarified - in the history of this page, there is only a reference to this person's citation. 49.181.220.86 (talk) 01:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I will flag this page for review again. 88.239.138.93 (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

This page should be deleted
Agree with the previous post. What's the use of this page on Wikipedia? 49.195.113.30 (talk) 02:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * While you're talking to yourself, perhaps you could explain which of the significant contributors to the article history you think is the "self" that is doing the self-promotion here. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * it's not the article sources. You are clearly biased with the tone you are using in your reply. I ask again, do all academics at all universities have a Wiki page? have you seen the recent rankings based on publications? academics who deserve a Wiki page are those who have had an actual significant contribution to their field recognised for it. Either way, let's leave this conversation here public so users can judge. 49.186.30.211 (talk) 01:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 👍 103.237.137.48 (talk) 08:21, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Yet another page on Wikipedia for some random academic. 91.223.100.53 (talk) 12:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)