Talk:Sustainable Homes

The page contains headings but does not have images or references. I like how there are sub-categories under green insulataion. The area that needs the most revision on this page is to add references. Zkuhlwei (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

This article needs references. Other than that, the article had a neutral point of view and is easy to read. Ddoll01 (talk) 16:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

1. Citations 2. Numbering in wind energy system doesn't really fit the rest of the article's format 3. Expand solar energy section (Costs, benefits, maintenence, etc). Solar hot water assist maybe? 4. Green insulation: "You know that..." could be worded better for a technical article. "Widely known" too. 5. "HVAC is an acronym that stands for" could clean up your meaning 6. Just generally copy-edit for more professional speech and make sure you only present information that can be externally cited. Good and useful article! --Iantownsend88 (talk) 16:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

test Eakes27 (talk) 16:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The headings and organiztion is nice. It would be better if images and references were added. I also believe that more information should be added to solar energy and the greeen types of insulation. Otherwise, it is a nice article. --Maxaroni2006 (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

This article should include references and images to provide your reader with examples of what sustainable homes look like.--Renardthefox (talk) 16:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

No references --Pjones77 (talk) 16:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Ian pretty much said it. Citations needed, but other than that it looks professional and full of info! Dgrubesk (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

What I liked most about the page was the layout of the article. The article did not appear to be cluttered with information. What needed the most attention was adding in the references throughout the article. --Eakes27 (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The article needs references, and pictures might be helpful. The article was very informative.--SFL123 (talk) 16:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

As previously mentioned, references are a necessity. Otherwise, a good article, however you may wish to include some information about different types of sustainable architecture (geodesic dome, green roof, etc.). --Aaron.a.high (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

A good start. Here are some thoughts.

The lead paragraph could be improved. The second sentence feels like it should come in a subheading. I think it should be replaced by a sentence that suggest sustainable homes relate to a general movement towards sustainable development, and then you deal with the current building regulations in the subsection.

Also, look at the format requirements for lead paragraphs: bold the first mention of your topic.

Besides a subsection on current regulations, you should probably include something on the history of sustainable homes.

You need references in the text of the article and at the end!! Also, be sure to link to categories. Perhaps add an image?--Sandybaldwin (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)