Talk:Sutorina

Bosnian territory claims
Stop the false editing. No government official from Bosnia and Herzegovina has ever said that Sutorina should be a part of the Bosnian territory! Do something useful instead, like, uploading some photos or stuff... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.94.101.49 (talk • contribs) 14 April 2010‎


 * Before my cleanup yesterday, the article appeared to be a big WP:COATRACK violation - it focused entirely on a fairly low-intensity territorial dispute, without providing sources. It still contains the bulk of that information, but without the most egregiously biased parts. It could still use some help, though. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 06:28, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * The dispute content is now at Sutorina dispute. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If everything about the dispute is transferred from the Sutorina page to the dispute page then we can proceed on removing the "merge process" template on the page. Cheers. Hazbulator™ 22:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazbulator (talk • contribs)
 * I suggest moving Sutorina dispute to Sutorina, instead of having two articles.--Z oupan 00:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The location is a gazetteer item and as such it deserves an article according to WP:5, it's not inherently notable just because of the dispute. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC)