Talk:Suzanne Evans

Acting leader, new leader?
This is being inserted, a web search didn't verify the uncited addition - there are lots of, she is the favorite to be reliable sources but nothing to claim she is the new leader or the acting leader , such as has been adding to the article without any WP:RS to support the claim and so I have removed the claims Govindaharihari (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Now official reported, added http://www.itv.com/news/central/update/2015-05-08/farage-names-shrewsburys-evans-as-ukip-leader/ Govindaharihari (talk) 11:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Suzanne Evans' full date of birth
Evans' full date of birth is not protected private information for the purpose of Wikipedia, thus admissible; however, unsourced full date of birth, or a date of birth of which its evidence is a direct reliance on the record of births and birth certificates from the functions of General Registry Office executed and realised by Her Majesty's Passport Office, within the Home Office, is not permissible by the currently generally-agreed rules of Wikipedia and published accordingly, as an abuse and a misuse of primary sources (WP:BLPPRIMARY); nor is the result of a cursory search made with Google considered an admissible reliable source for Wikipedia; nor are sources, post-dating the insertion of such a full date of birth before its subsequent removal from view (as inadmissible circular source); however, sources, ideally printed or also printed, which primarily or mainly deal with British politics or British political biographies, would not only be generally acceptable but also highly desirable.

Records from Companies House of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, however, do not serve to certify dates of birth of directors or shareholders with any accuracy, authority or warranty, nor does Companies House claim or state that they certify dates of birth, with or without accuracy, authority or warranty (or indeed they actually have any authority for them to do so, were they to elect to do so): they only serve to state the claimed dates of birth, which are (and must be presumed to be) unverified information submitted and accepted "as it is", or, as it was when it was given in submission; thus unpublished (or even published) released British corporate records submitted are inadmissible also as unreliable as proof of the date of birth of a living person. -- Urquhartnite (talk) 05:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)