Talk:Suzanne Manet

If it isn't broken
Then don't fix it...Modernist (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * My idea was that this lovely woman is not exacly well represented. Those scans are bad. Really bad quality, it does not give the artwork their potential, if I could fix that -that would be different, so from my point of view it is broken. I think it presents all scans we have on her, bad as well as good ones. Also, could you <<KINDLY stop reverting my changes, and discuss them with me instead, please. You are the person and Ewulp that just simply revert changes with no discussions. Try to think about that many times there is a good reason behind it, I am not a vandal or an idiot, you should have noticed by now hopefully. I an trying to ameliorate most articles. Hafspajen (talk) 19:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The gallery looks awful, the colors are crashing with each other and the scans are unacceptable low quality. It is much better without them than with them, that is why I said less is more. WILL YOU discuss things with me  about this issue, instead of reverting me all the time? It is rude to revert instead of discuss. The article soon will have a lot of hits, because a picture is getting featured, here, Featured picture candidates/Édouard MANET - La Nymphe surprise - Google Art Project.jpg. If you have anything against this version - tell me what the issue is, please.  Hafspajen (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I re-added the two images that you deleted without discussion with me. When I pretty much created this article - the purpose was to include as many paintings of Mme. Manet as we had available. You unilaterally changed this article; as you do with many articles that others have worked on for years, without discussion; so if you don't mind - rudeness works both ways. The two paintings that you deleted are perfectly good images, one is used in the German version and the other is an excellent example of a late painterly Manet, please leave them alone...Modernist (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

DEATH
How did she die?