Talk:Suzette Kent

Response to proposal for deletion
I don't understand the motivation of AusLondonder in proposing deletion. Sources, such as the national archives are imminantly verifyable. I don't see any effort to verify. Some examples easily accessable:

Suzette Kent | IBM Center for The Business of Government

HHRG-117-GO24-Bio-KentS-20220120.pdf (house.gov)

Burt Harris (talk) 20:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Two primary sources. Have you heard of WP:BASIC? "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. AusLondonder (talk) 23:26, 29 April 2024 (UTC)