Talk:Svetlana-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shorty. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Lead;
 * the remaining ship was scrapped -> the remainder was scrapped
 * Suggest removing "now" from "now renamed Profintern", because it is not the present, a bit awkward.
 * Remainder is generally plural.
 * Section 1;
 * 1912–16 to 1912–1916 per MOS:DATERANGE
 * 9,660,000 rubles; Perhaps add a conversion to USD for better understanding, also for 8,300,000 rubles
 * It's almost impossible to convert warship costs into modern dollars as they're capital costs and have massively exceeded inflation.
 * four gearedref Curtis-AEG-Vulkan steam turbines; this is bit confusing, there is a chance that user may take it for steam turbine having four gears instead the count of four turbines used. Reword it to avoid confusion.
 * I see your point, but I've been using this standard wording for years and nobody's ever questioned it before. Mainly, I think, that turbines with four gears would be written with a hyphen, forex: four-geared steam turbines.
 * In the infobox, it is mentioned that the boilers were water-tube boilers, mention the same in prose also.
 * Yarrow boilers are water-tube boilers so I've fixed the infobox.
 * maximum elevation was limited to 75°; + or -
 * Conversion for 76 millimeters and 25 millimeters
 * Both converted on first use.
 * Inconsistency in usage; 25-millimeter, 76 millimeters, 130-millimeter, 20 millimeters also some case exist in later paras
 * The hyphen is used for compound adjectives like 130-millimeter gun, or 25-millimeter armor plate, not for armor plates 25 millimeters thick, etc.
 * Section 2; Could links be made to the sister ship articles.
 * Sure.
 * Section 3;
 * Link Reval
 * Linked in the table above.
 * After "her overhaul in 1939", there is an unnecessary space before the reference.
 * 1941—42 to 1941–1942, en dash should be used for date ranges.
 * Section 5; Rohwer, Jürgen (2005) and Whitley, M. J. (1995) are never used for citations.
 * Infobox (out of GA criteria); Change ranges per MOS:DATERANGE
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Any update on this? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

All done, see if my changes have fixed the issues that you've identified.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)