Talk:Svetlana Bakhmina

Not neutral
Someone put a tag on the Svetlana Bakhmina article that it is not neutral, I would like to fix this, but I need to know what the complaints are, so I can solve it, please let me know Pernambuco 00:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The article takes a position that Bakhmina is not guilty of the charges against her and pushes that position through most of the article; further, many of the statements are weasel-worded. Valrith 15:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * But if it is clear from the evidence presented that she is not guilty, and even the Procuracy-General of the Russian Federation has stated that she is merely being held as a hostage, why should the author take any other position? THAT would be not-neutral.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.79.159 (talk) 03:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure that she is inocent - you know oil, big money_in_Russia, "muddy water".

There also was sad that she was taken as a hostage by government. Not that her lawer sad so, but put as a fact.
 * Anyway - I have a question if she become pregnant when she already was prison.--Oleg Str (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, it is quite possible that she is a hostage to the Government. She became pregnant after being taken to the custody Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)