Talk:Sway (Tove Styrke song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 13:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Gave the song a listen as I was writing the review. I quite liked it and I'm not even that into electropop, so I'm glad I got the chance to listen to something new from this process.

Background and release

 * "but she also worked" The "but" here is technically a word to watch, although not a particularly problematic usage. Consider a wee rewrite.
 * Done maybe? Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Any other sources for its digital release and lack of cover art than its Apple Music store pages? In particular, the lack of cover art detail feels a bit synthy.
 * Removed the cover art part. Apple Music is used to verify the release date and label, ref 8 verifies the actual release of the song. Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok good, I think this is an acceptable use. --Grnrchst (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Composition and lyrics

 * No notes.

Reception

 * Adam Graham quote is missing a closing quotation mark.
 * Oops, done! Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Music video

 * Comment: "Young London skaters are not known for their love of appearing in pop videos." Lol.
 * It's commonly understood, so may not be necessary, but consider adding a link to London.
 * Not done as London is London. Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Live performances

 * "as an innovative to end the show" Should this say "as an innovative way to end the show" or "as an innovative end to the show"?
 * Mercy me! Fixed. Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Credits and personnel

 * No notes.

Charts

 * Did it not chart outside of Sweden? Just wondering as earlier Matt Nied said "this could easily dominate the charts."
 * It did not :( Tove is not a hitmaker on the charts. Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Release history

 * Shouldn't this include the album release? Or is that not standard for singles releases?
 * The table is just for the release of the single, not the album. Pancake (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Checklist
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * A couple minor, easily-fixed grammatical issues.
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * One case of a word to watch, but an unproblematic one. Manual of Style is otherwise followed to the letter.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * Not so sure about using a store page as a source, but if it's unavoidable, it's not so bad in most cases. Problematic store page use removed.
 * c. (OR):
 * One case of potential synth, noted above. Verified most of the quotes in spotchecks of the sources. Assuming good faith on subscription-only Swedish language sources.
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Earwig only flags the direct, attributed quotes.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Audio file falls under fair use. Photo is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Holding for now. Only some very minor grammatical and sourcing issues are keeping me from quick-passing this. Once they've been addressed, I'll happily pass the review. Excellent work on this article PancakeMistake. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Audio file falls under fair use. Photo is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Holding for now. Only some very minor grammatical and sourcing issues are keeping me from quick-passing this. Once they've been addressed, I'll happily pass the review. Excellent work on this article PancakeMistake. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Audio file falls under fair use. Photo is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Holding for now. Only some very minor grammatical and sourcing issues are keeping me from quick-passing this. Once they've been addressed, I'll happily pass the review. Excellent work on this article PancakeMistake. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Pass/fail:
 * Holding for now. Only some very minor grammatical and sourcing issues are keeping me from quick-passing this. Once they've been addressed, I'll happily pass the review. Excellent work on this article PancakeMistake. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Holding for now. Only some very minor grammatical and sourcing issues are keeping me from quick-passing this. Once they've been addressed, I'll happily pass the review. Excellent work on this article PancakeMistake. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for addressing all my points! I'll pass the review now, as all the main grammatical and sourcing issues have been dealt with. Do consider adding quotes for the subscription-required sources, but that's not a blocker to passing. Nice work! --Grnrchst (talk) 11:29, 1 July 2023 (UTC)