Talk:Sweat (Ciara song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thevampireashlee (talk · contribs) 12:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Can't wait to begin reviewing this article. I will start either today or tomorrow. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Initial comments
As it stands, the article is in pretty good shape, what would be expected of a GA for a song such as this. Structurally, the article is well put-together. The lead appears sufficient. Most of the sources are reputable. (I'm on the fence about source number 5). The image is appropriately licensed. A sound clip may help enhance the article, although one is not required. The word "song's" in the second sentence of "Chart performance" is inappropriately apostrophized. Detailed suggestions will begin shortly. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 12:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Responses
 * Singer's room was awarded best "Soul Music Site" by the 2010 Soul Train Awards and XXL magazine called it a reputable website. Its been used in other GAs so I assumed its ok. I can replace with something else if need be.
 * I considered a song sample but since the song isn't actually available to purchase, nor was it released as a free download technically speaking there isn't a away of legally obtaining a sample unless a radio recording would be permitted.
 * Correct apostrophe issue. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  13:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That's fine. No sound clips is needed. Thanks for the insight on Singer's Room. I looked it up and couldn't find anything notable right away. I can verify what you said though, so I'd definitely consider it notable.--Thevampireashlee (talk) 13:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Sources
 * Rap-Up is cited thrice, but it's formatted differently each time. Rap Up, Rap-Up.com, and rap-up.com. For consistency sake, make them all uniform. Plus, the publication is a magazine, so it needs italics.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Billboard.biz is cited thrice as well, but source 10 links to Billboard (magazine) and Prometheus Global Media. Source six is the first instance of this, so that should be linked to instead.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Source 13 - we have an article on Buzz Media. Idolator needs to be Idolator (website) with a pipe.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * "Jive had failed to support Ciara creatively and to some extent financially on previous albums..." - "had" is redundant. There needs to be a comma after "albums". Does the Background section expand on how Ciara was creatively and financially set back because of the previous record deal? Right now, it seems a bit ambiguous. And how is something "to some extent" financially hampered? Would simply saying "creatively and financially" be best? And is the dangling particle necessary? It seems unnecessary to rehash that by saying, "...contributing the poor commercial performance of both records."
 * corrected the introduction stuff. Looking at the information, we know that Ciara had to pay $100,000 for the last music video from Basic Instinct, I could include this information if required. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "Ciara's new deal with Epic Records reunites..." - should be written in way that's timeless, so that it won't require editing in the future. Perhaps simply omitting the word "new" will suffice.
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Missing comma between "album" and "Goodies" in the last sentence of the first paragraph.
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Lead single should be linked in the first line of the second paragraph and delinked in the last paragraph.
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "Sweat' received a mixed reception from music critics." - awkward wording. Should be: "Sweat received mixed reviews from music critics." or something similar. "Music critics" could be linked to Music journalism. That's common for song articles.
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * "club banger" seems to be jargon. I would recommend replacing it with club music.
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There appears to be a comma splice after the word "banger". Replace it with a period, leaving "Likening" as the introductory clause of the proceeding sentence.
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Another comma splice. "...radio stations on June 18, 2012, however its planned..." should be "...radio stations on June, 18, 2012; however, its planned..."
 * corrected &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Background and release
 * Comma after Basic Instinct (2010) in the first sentence.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "underperformed" is one word.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The colon should be a semi colon, with a comma after "while".
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "...the Fantasy Ride era..." is jargon. Casual reads will not be able to identify with this.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "wasn't interested in first week sales or performance". is enclosed with quotation marks as if it was a direct quote, but the source does not support that. This phrase is never used in the text, although I do see how the original editor adapted it. Either a direct quote should be added, or the marks should be removed.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "...a Gerrick G. Kennedy..." is gimmicky and archaic. Why not simply, "However, Gerrick Kennedy, from..."?
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "...either Fantasy Ride or Basic Instinct." perhaps I'm nitpicking, but shouldn't this be: "...both Fantasy Ride and Basic Instinct."?
 * changed &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "including" in the next sentence should be "included".
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Again "commercially viable" is not a direct quote appearing in the Rap-Up source that follows. I think it needs to be cited or removed. Otherwise, it's potentially defamatory original research.
 * removed as it was speculation &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  17:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Stopping for now...--Thevampireashlee (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Composition and reviews
 * Compositions should not be plural.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "uptempo" is not supported by the source.
 * the very nature of club music is uptempo. As per the article electronic dance music the up-tempo nature is given by the beats per minute. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "base-heavy" is a spelling error. Should be "bass-heavy". Bass should probaby link to Roland TR-808
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Club song could probably link to Electronic dance music again, with rapper linking to rapping.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * A comma belongs after "release" in the next sentence. Another comma after "singles" in the sentence after that.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * " "Sweat" is a throwback to Ciara's roots, drawing comparison to and inspiration from the singer's previous singles "Goodies" (2004) and "Like a Boy" (2006)" is not supported by the Rapfix source. No instance of "throwback" or "roots" are mentioned. Goodies is not mentioned, although a slight pun on the word "goodie" seems to infer that. Like a Boy is mentioned, though. Revise the sentence so that it mentions the similarities between "Sweat" and "Like a Boy".
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ❌. Only "Goodies" was removed. The other errors were not corrected. The sentence makes no sense now and is worse than before. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 22:12, 30 August 2012

(UTC)
 * , chaned. Used the phrase "brings us back to Ciara’s old roots" as given in the MTV source. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  20:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Missing a comma after "Townsend".
 * ❌, commas are not required before the word 'and'. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Missing a comma after the word "line".
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Otherwise, okay.


 * Chart performance
 * "Sweat' made its chart debut on June 23, 2012 on, where it debuted straight at number one." is far too wordy, reusing the same words. Try trimming it down. Suggestion: "On June 23, 2012, "Sweat" debuted at number one on the US Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart."
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Airplay is an unfamiliar term to those who aren't music enthusiasts. Link to it.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * "It would go on to peak at number eighty-six." should be "It went on to peak..."
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Table is good.


 * Release history
 * All good here.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Categories, templates, and references.
 * 2012 singles and Epic Records singles? Should these be changed to "promotional singles" or simply "songs"? Hair (Lady Gaga song), a GA promotional single, uses "songs" as opposed to singles.
 * corrected. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  <sup style="color:black;">[talk]  21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Other than this, great job. After these last few changes are made, I'll promote this to good. Excellent work and thanks for being patient with me. :) --Thevampireashlee (talk) 19:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Overall appraisal
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Waiting on copy edits. Done
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Superb layout. Adheres to MoS. Lead adequately summarizes all points of the article.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * References listed at the bottom under a header.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * All challeng-able statements are sourced reliably.
 * C. No original research:
 * All possible instances of OR have been resolved.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Adequately coverage for a song of this type.
 * B. Focused:
 * Stays on topic.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Any biases have been resolved.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * No edit wars.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * No relevant images available. Single cover is appropriately licensed, sourced, and rationalized for fair use.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * No images available.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Awaiting final changes.