Talk:Sweet Nothing (Taylor Swift song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 07:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * "a month before Midnights release" → a month before Midnights' release
 * "a month before Midnights release" → a month before Midnights' release

"and was credited" → and is credited

"long time collaborator" → long-time collaborator or longtime collaborator

"was included" → is included

"recorded her performance" → recorded Swift's performance

"described the song as "buoyantly free" and "delightfully naive", and called it a "simple gem" → three quotes seems a bit much

"every Midnights' track" → every Midnights track

"subtle gestures is one" → subtle gestures are one

"alongside the" → along with the

Republic Records is mentioned in the infobox but not the prose (Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * The top 100 chart peaks are statistics which require an inline reference; I don't believe a note directing the reader to a section supports the positions. I would probably just omit them from the section.
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Hey thanks for the review thus far. I have addressed the comments accordingly :) Ippantekina (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks good! As someone who focuses on Mariah Carey articles I am somewhat jealous that there is enough content for so many articles on Taylor Swift's album tracks. It's really great to see this coverage and have it be incorporated in good articles. If you have time, Clown (Mariah Carey song) would benefit from a GA review! Thanks, Heartfox (talk) 03:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)