Talk:Sweetums (Parks and Recreation)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Arctic   Night  08:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

General comments
Fix these issues up and I'll happily pass this article. I can't find anything else wrong here.  Arctic   Night  09:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * First sentence of 'Plot': should 'parks and recreation' be capitalised? Later on in that section it is. Not sure what the actual spelling is.
 * I capitalized it. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * In the lead, 'sweetums' is not capitalised, whilst in the plot section it is. I think this should be consistent.
 * I also capitalized this. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * In the first sentence of 'Cultural references' there is a reference to an earlier episode. Is this really 'cultural'? I wouldn't say so, as it's a self-reference!
 * I think this should be reworded: "Leslie tells Ron she had already written a eulogy for him and it starts".
 * A similar issue came up at Talk:Galentine's Day. I explained my reasoning there, so please take a look at that discussion and see if you agree. If you don't, let me know and we'll figure out the best way to deal with it... —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * According to Citing sources, you should cite the quotation immediately after the quotation itself. I know it's a little pedantic - see User:Ealdgyth/GA review cheatsheet for reasoning. For example, 'Matt Fowler of IGN called it a "fantastic episode"' should be 'Matt Fowler of IGN called it a "fantastic episode".[12]'.
 * I think I got them all. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The final paragraph of 'Reception' contains the word 'said' five times by my count. You may like to consider cutting it down, although this won't really affect a pass/fail or anything.
 * I replaced some, let me know if we need more. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that the word 'propaganda' sounds like it's pushing a bit of a POV. However, according to propaganda, the videos shown in the episode were essentially just that, propaganda, so I can't really think of anything better to say. Never mind.
 * Ok. lol —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I know I've already said it, but remember to cite those quotations, especially the one from The Star-Ledger!
 * Ok. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The image in the infobox should probably have some alt text. See WP:ALT for help.
 * Added. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  15:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, passed.  Arctic   Night  11:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)