Talk:Symphony No. 3 (Elgar/Payne)

Title
Our article on Beethoven's 10th Symphony is called Symphony No. 10 (Beethoven/Cooper). That recognises it's not purely a work by Beethoven, but is Barry Cooper's idea of what Beethoven might have written had he lived.

Similarly, shouldn't this article be called Symphony No. 3 (Elgar/Payne)?

From the lede: ... officially known as "Edward Elgar: the sketches for Symphony No 3 elaborated by Anthony Payne" or in brief "Elgar/Payne Symphony No 3. --   Jack of Oz   [your turn]  08:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * No objections, so I've moved the page. --   Jack of Oz   [your turn]  23:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Not that it matters particularly, but isn't he second movement evolved (either by Elgar or Payne) from a movement in the "King Arthur" incidental music?Delahays (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)