Talk:Syncona

Added information
What of the three pieces of information in my edit you consider "spam" and why? And what not? Thanks in advance for your objective feedback.

1) "With a Figure of 1.4 billion market capitalisation considered to be UK's largest life science fund" - based on Citywire source

2) "It holds investments in Freeline, Achilles Therapeutics, Autolus and Anaveon" - with Citywire source

3) "and it founded Resolution (cell therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease) and Purespring (gene therapy)" - based on Citywire source  --

Cucina11 (talk) 17:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep, exactly that. Standard "look how neat they are" type puff. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It's been a while I just came back to this. You really seem to have overreacted here. And didn't answer my question at all. 2) and 3) are neither positive nor negative, but just a pure description of what they do. 1) is a positive statement, but should it not be mentioned in Wikipedia at all which is the largest life science fund (according to an independent source) at all? Just because it is positive? Should there also be no mentioning that Kylian Mbappé is World Champion in football, because it's "look how neat I am"? Cucina11 (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)