Talk:Syriac Orthodox Archbishop of Jerusalem

Avoid War Editing
The given information is reliable with given information and reference to check either, then kindly avoid edit war and help to increase content quantity with evidence. Thank You EldhoseTalk 08:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , yes, I found your latest contributions to be a net negative so I have joined in reverting you. Do not edit war, discuss the changes on this page and perhaps we will encourage you to do something constructive. Elizium23 (talk) 04:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Iam given information is reliable sources, yet It is not negative available from book sources and reference sites EldhoseTalk 04:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Elizium23 It is not negative sources, The Syriac Orthodox Church of Jerusalem, Syriac Orthodox Archdiocese of Jerusalem, Patriarchal Archdiocese of the Holy Land and Jordan is official names from constitution of Syriac Orthodox Church.
 * After the Fourth ecumenical council, also known as Council of Chalcedon. The church broke into Chalcedon and non Chalcedon. After, the Jerusalem church broke into two parts also known as Greek Church and Syriac Church. In 451 or 452, the non-Chalcedonian(Syriac Church) clergy elected a bishop Theodosius of Jerusalem who was forced into exile in 453, this refer from Bitton-Ashkelony & Kofsky (2006), p. 52. and the Council of Chalcedon (451) Jerusalem became an independent patriarchate, but the Syr. Orth. Church and the Ch. of E., who either rejected or ignored this council, continued to see Jerusalem as being under the authority of the patriarchate of Antioch(available from syrian site, given below mentioned also get it from Theodosius of Jerusalem (died 457) Article), The St. Mary Magdalene Church, site was the house of Simon the Leper, who invited Jesus to supper(According to John of Wurzburg (1160-1170 AD ), the site was the house of Simon the Leper, who invited Jesus to supper|Description of the Holy Land|p 23-24),In 16th Century, the title of Patriarch was used in Archdiocese of Syriac Orthodox Church Jerusalem for honor, yet did not have Patriarchal rank(Syriac Site, given below), Today, Monastery of Saint Mark, Jerusalem, acquired from Coptic Orthodox Church(Syriac Site), Syriac Site is, Before he point the article own, without point of ref book, but I found another ref for that from another site. EldhoseTalk 04:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , you didn't address any of the objections that we have. But you created a useless WP:WALLOFTEXT. Bravo. Elizium23 (talk) 05:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * where did say, syriac orthodox first church is St.Magdalene Church? EldhoseTalk 05:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Iam not doing WP:WALLOFTEXT useless things, without any reliable reference, Their Fake history makes EldhoseTalk 05:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * where did say, syriac orthodox first church is St.Magdalene Church? Falsely, It say's first syriac church is St.Magdalene church is newly built in 5th century? Prove that! The content is to be create as fake history with out say any other book? Iam already find one that is about saint mark monastery in content? And find another reference for source! EldhoseTalk 06:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * User:Srnec, User:Elizium23, Iam agree your objections, but neglect some fake history, that is happened. Iam ready to include more content and included for this, Iam already avoid fake content(the point is not included on reference book) of St.Mark Monastery and include reliable resourse. Thank you EldhoseTalk 07:08, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , because your edits are a net negative and not constructive, I have elected per WP:TNT to go back to a revision prior to your attacking it with hundreds of bad edits. This is the consensus version. You have been warned about edit-warring. If you revert again we will find ourselves on the WP:ANEW board and you won't like the results. Elizium23 (talk) 04:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I was wrong before. Now there is no fault so there is no right to revert! How can you revert an article with a proof of the name of the Grammatical mystic?. Article is proof and should not be done! You argue for things that are not proof! EldhoseTalk 04:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Honestly, man, your English is not so good. I can't make heads or tails of the comments you leave. I have no idea what you are talking about. Just quit reverting this article. Elizium23 (talk) 04:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

'''Once again request for help! not for revert'''

I am disagree with about St. Magdalene church My fact is the site was the house of Simon the Leper, who invited Jesus to supper(with in of John of Wurzburg (1160-1170 AD)) But they argue that the temple was founded in the fifth century.

And also, Iam added about history, Patriarch name used(yet didn't have patriarchal rank), Bishop name, split of chalcedon and non chalcedon in jerusalem church(With the help of Theodosius of Jerusalem Article) and their patriarch's, Jerusalem church in early centuries,List of Churches... etc.

The point of St. Mark Monastey is that the evidence and explanation they gave did not match, so they believed it was a false story, and then another evidence was discovered and completed.

Don't forget to include these things.You hide a lot of things. So you can't agree with me and you distort history. <b style="color:black; font-family:Bradley Hand ITC">Eldhose</b>Talk 04:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)