Talk:Systematic inventive thinking

why I ask to remove deletion notice...
As notability guidelines specify: "… there must be verifiable, objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention from independent sources to support a claim of notability". In my case the topic is a well-known innovation methodology, derived from another (and better known) innovation methodology named TRIZ (which also has an article of its own, and mentioned SIT in it, long before this article has been created). This methodology has been developed by two Israeli academic figures, and is being taught in various academic institutions as a creative problem solving and NPD methodology. Furthermore, the content which I've cited is based on various journals (namely Harvard Business Review, Science magazine, Marketing Research, etc.), and I fail to see why the above isn't account as an evidence for "significant attention from independent sources". Please clarify if (and which) other actions are ought to be taken in order to verify notability. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danedt (talk • contribs) 19:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Merge "function follows form" paragraphs
There are currently two separate paragraphs with their own headlines describing "function follows form" principle of SIT method. Shouldn't these be merged into one? 157.25.121.92 (talk) 07:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC) jknowak

Improve
Came across this page and see the tags. Will try and improve it accordingly. MaskedSinger (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)