Talk:Systemics

Is it correct to use systemics as a noun referring to a generic object whose nature can be understood in that scientifical framework?
I didn't speak English in the cradle, that's why I'm asking. Phrases like Young developed a systemics for learning sound baffling to me, much like the use of the term technology to mean a technological device. Considering that Systemics, as a term, is of rather recent coin and somewhat limited usage, I fear such usage may result in obscure text.

As for the grammar, I'd never dare say Watt developed a physics for controlling steam engines, but I'd leave this for English speaking wikipedians. ale (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Pseudoscience?
I find the references at the www.enformy.com page highly suspect, as they discuss "afterlife", "telepathy", etc. While I don't want to violate anybody's right to write about such things, maybe I can draw your attention to the references by Don Watson at the bottom of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 06:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Possible copyright infringements
By rewriting this article Sept 2007 I most likely introduced some possible copyright infringements. The text is well cited by might miss quotation marks and needs some rewriting. For the record: These further edits left a great deal of the initial rewritting intact, which should be checked within a short period from now. I and/or others will try to solve this problem as soon as possible. Your welcome to participate. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * In Sept 2007 in 10 eidts I rewrote much of the former article, see here
 * Ever since 63 edits have taken place here by several editors, see here.

Article section(s) removed
Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed one or more section of this article for now.

I apologize for all inconvenience I have caused here, see also here. If you would like to assist in improving this article, please let me know. I can use all the help I can get. Thank you.

-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I remove spam web links
I have removed these links I consider as spam->


 * Watson, D. E., G. E. Schwartz, L. G. S. Russek (1998), The Theory of Enformed Systems - A Paradigm of Organization and Holistic Systems
 * Donald E. Watson (2005), Systemics: The Most Basic Science. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feministo (talk • contribs) 13:57, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge?
I can't find the word "Systemics" in my dictionaries, which I find a shame as a word like this, to distinguish elementary cause effect analysis from systemic ones, would be useful. The word "systemic" is in common use. If the word "systemics" is held to be solely associated with Mario Bunge then perhaps this article should be a redirect to his page. Otherwise the definition should perhaps be made more general (as the FreeDictionary entry above). Bunge's definition of the word, seems impossibly wide. LookingGlass (talk) 15:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Systemics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060616081808/http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/~gossimit/ifsr/francois/papers/systemics_and_cybernetics_in_a_historical_perspective.pdf to http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/~gossimit/ifsr/francois/papers/systemics_and_cybernetics_in_a_historical_perspective.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

systemics = systems science
Systemics designates, in other languages, what in english is usually called systems science : "...an interdisciplinary field that studies the nature of systems—from simple to complex—in nature, society, cognition, and science itself."

This article (Systemics) should simply be made a redirect, and interesting additional information found in it, if any, be melted there. (In the frech-speaking wikipedia, the opposite is done : "systems science" just redirects to "systemics".) denis &#39;spir&#39; (talk) 08:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)