Talk:T-15 (reactor)

Could move to T-15 (tokamak)
'Reactor' is far too vague. - Rod57 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Fusion reactor. Still a reactor, in fact a prototype-research one, in nuclear context. T-15 (fusion reactor). 17387349L8764 (talk) 08:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on T-15 (reactor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050225172107/http://www.kiae.ru:80/eng/str/inf/o11nsi.htm to http://www.kiae.ru/eng/str/inf/o11nsi.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Effects of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident on Utility Share Prices
"Effects of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident on Utility Share Prices. Rajiv Kalra, Glenn V. Henderson, Jr. and Gary A. Raines. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Spring, 1993), pp. 52–77."

I do not see how this belongs here and adds to T-15. The article paragraph "This combined with the USSR's desire for cheaper energy ensured the continuing progress of the T-15 under Mikhail S. Gorbachev. It was designed to replace the country's use of gas and coal as the primary sources of energy." is uncited and not part of this research paper, which talks about something completely different. Example from abstract "This study measures stock market reaction to Chernobyl using the event parameter approach, which uses dummy variables. Results indicate negative price reactions to the accident"

Second, the paper does not reference anything in the article, but just as 'further reading'. Hence will be deleted, if no adequate rational is given. KR 17387349L8764 (talk) 08:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)