Talk:TEOCO

Improvement
There are no public domain images of logo or HQ or execs. Could do with adding. Needs more details still and an update of financials, but as a private company this information is hard to find. The only public source I could find it from an interview the CEO did in 2014 which is now very out of date.SandrinaHatman (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Accusations of promotional content
If there is any promotional language or inaccuracies please highlight here so it can be discussed and edited. Do not mass delete information because it is introducing inaccuracy. Please have the courtesy to highlight here with your reasoning.84.68.167.255 (talk) 18:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I highlighted it by removing it. See the diff. Also, per WP:NOT we do not maintain customer listings on Wikipedia. - MrOllie (talk) 18:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The Frost & Sullivan "award" is junk - vanity/paid material and not really useful. If there's something notable about a relationship with a customer and it is well-sourced (not just silly press releases), then it's fair game, but that list did look like puffery. A lot of this article looks like it was written with promotion in mind. Kuru   (talk)  18:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * How about you discuss it before you delete? Going through a technical software company and adding "buzzword" for software descriptions is stupid. This is B2B technology. I totally disagree this article was written with promotion in mind. Promotion is where you say something is better, best etc. Saying something "is" is not promotion. I think Frost & Sullivan as an industry analyst firm wouldn't agree that their awards are junk. Do you actually know who they are? As for cited customers being either promotional or puffery that is nonsense. For B2B software we need to know who the customers are because many of these firms are projects - do they have real citable customers is very important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.44.129 (talk) 18:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)