Talk:TNA Turning Point

2007
Whoever put that it would be Kaz v Angle is incorrect, TNAwrestling.com reveals that Kaz will get his title shot on the upcoming iMPACT. Ytoabn&#39;s Blog: http&#58;//ytoabn.blogspot.com/ 13:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do NOT deleted the theme song information, the information is CORRECT as the song was used in many video packages advertising the event and played during the opening pyro of the event.! 23:39, 12 January 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.242.159 (talk)
 * As I said at Talk:TNA Genesis, it will not stay if you can't provide a reliable source where TNA said it was the theme song (which they never did. The only PPV to have an official theme song from TNA was Slammiversary 2007).  TJ   Spyke   00:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

2005
Was the match between Monty Brown and Jarrett announced yet? I mean, I know he's the #1 contender after the match at Genesis, but the Turning Point page on TNAWrestling.com only has the Sabu vs Abyss match listed. - Methnor 14:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Nope. And I was at the iMPACT! tapings Tuesday night. Wait until Saturday. You might be surprised. Then again, if you're a longtime TNA watcher, you may not be surprised. --Kitch 19:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Is the Tables Match between AMW and The Dudley Boyz for the NWA Tag Team Title? It just says "tables match" on the graphic at TNAWrestling.com, but surely it's a title match, right? ekedolphin 06:55, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * They have confirmed in the community boards that it is indeed a title match. --Kitch 19:16, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Kayfabe reminder
Please do not post scheduled matches that have not been "officially" announced. This is why I made Template:Kayfabe. It is a service to the marks that we who are smarts and smarks not give things away. --Kitch 18:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

A few notes
First off: match order doesn't matter. It doesn't have to be a copy from TNA's official site. The only exception to this is: main events are listed at the top. Secondly: the same thing applies to which wrestler is listed first. The only exception to this is: the champions are always listed first. There are no Pro Wrestling project policies on these matters: it's just a few editors controlling the article with their own policies. RobJ1981 19:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

The 10000 thumbtack match
y is the hiyperlink goes to the Hardcare Wresling page when it talks nothing about the match —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhauth11 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There is a noted in the hardcore wrestling page about thumbtacks. There used to be a section on the match at List of professional wrestling match types, but that was deleted and the hardcore wrestling page is the next best thing I could find.  TJ   Spyke   00:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Well the re ad the thumtacks page to List of professional wrestling match types. --121.219.166.66 (talk) 02:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)--121.219.166.66 (talk) 02:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Feast or Fired
I found a complete list of who's in the 15 man Feast or Fired Match. The list is as follows:

Scott Steiner Chris Harris Triple X - Elix Skipper, Christopher Daniels, Senshi Sonjay Dutt Petey Williams LAX - Homicide, Hernandez VKM - B.G. James, Kip James The Rock & Rave Infection - Lance Hoyt, Jimmy Rave Shark Boy Raven

I'm not 100% if this is official or not but it looks pretty official, Steiner has been confirmed, also the video promotion for the match says LAX, VKM and Triple X are in it. As far as Raven, now that Havok has been reverted back to Johnny Devine and Serotonin is dead, what else has he got to do. Jay794 21:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sure I don't need to say that the list can't go in since it's not sourced. The only one confirmed so far is Steiner (and that is because he said it himself in a promo on iMPACT). That list does sound plausible though.   TJ   Spyke   22:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

2007- Knockouts Tag Match Finish
To me, it looked like the finish came from a combination Russian legsweep by Velvet Sky and big boot/yakuza kick by Angelina Love. If you watch the match, you can clearly see Sky extend the arm of Roxxi Laveaux (which is part of the set-up for a Russian legsweep and is even mentioned in the Wiki entry for the move) and fall back with Laveaux after the kick. However, making this change is disputed because Dave Meltzer wrote a play-by-play of the PPV and only mentions the kick. I think the article should be changed to reflect the combination finish. It's rather clear what Velvet Sky is doing and it's very easy for Meltzer to make a mistake when typing up the results of a show. Does anyone else who saw the match agree with me? -WikiFew (talk) 04:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * After watching the match on YouTube, I agree. It does look like Velevet Sky was doing a russian leg sweep at the same time as the kick from Love.  TJ   Spyke   04:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Velvet Sky
When are you guys gonna get her profile up and running —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.147.41 (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Somebody first has to create a good article for her on a test page, then ask an admin to unsalt her article so it can be moved there.  TJ   Spyke   04:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

09 merger
The event is two PPVs away. The date, the arena, the location, etc have all been announced.-- Will C  21:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3 events away (No Surrender and Bound for Glory come before it). Right now that is the only info. Why not stick to the standard we do for WWE PPV's and wait until it's 2 months away? Right now the seperate article for the event is not really needed IMO as it will remain in its current stub form for at least 6 more weeks.  TJ   Spyke   23:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Either way it will exist, why not let it just sit now? WWE events are created up and till Bragging Rights.-- Will C  00:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Under that logic, why not create the Survivor Series 09, Armageddon 09, Royal Rumble 10, and No Way Out 10 articles? They would all contain the exact same amount of info as this one. Bragging Rights is less than 2 months away, that's why it exists.  TJ   Spyke   01:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Why not create them? They've been announced. Well this event is only a week and two months away I do believe.-- Will C  01:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)