Talk:TNEB Limited

Merge proposal
Although having a different legal form, it is the same legal entity. There is a significant overlapping between these two articles. Beagel (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

It is not required to have two different articles, let it be the in TNEB and also people are more familiar with TNEB even though after the bifurcation as different entity Prev Ravanth (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

te == Seperation of TNEB == Actually TNEB was splitted in to 3 divisions before one year. I think seperate article is needed (After seperation).--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 05:34, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Separate articles for TANGEDCO & TANTRANSCO sounds good. TNEB Ltd. is yet the old one. Let it be the same. Restructured changes could be elaborated in the old TNEB articles. So this one be deleted or merged. Else it may be a confusing one for the first timers on the page. --BabuOnWiki (talk) 14:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello friends the articles Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & TNEB Limited must not merged, deleted (either of one) and redirected, they should be separate articles. Because after re-structuring a new entity is developed & old entity (the famous organisation) became defunct at this situation we the known & understandable peoples should tell the good information (true reliable) to the new readers. And also in nearer future (not far) these two articles would became a very essential thing. My suggestion is we should need two separate articles Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & TNEB Limited, for avoiding future confusions. ....... Thanking you Muniyankaruppan (talk) 18:32, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please be aware of the rules of Wikipedia. Being legally separate entity is not a reason for a separate article if the company de facto is the same and the most part of the body text duplicates the existing article. Please do not revert, do copy-paste move etc without discussion if there is the established consensus. Please also do not copy-paste copyrighted material from the websites as this violates copyrights rules. Beagel (talk) 18:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved: someone text-merged TNEB Limited into TNEB. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

TNEB Limited → TNEB – WP:NCCORP. The legal status suffix of a company is not normally included in the article title. Needs history merge before moving as there has been a number of copy-paste moves. Beagel (talk) 06:14, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.