Talk:TRANSFAC

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 00:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

TRANSFAC → Transfac – Per MOS:TMRULES: Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official". --Relisted. Dekimasu よ! 20:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC) Ground Zero | t 22:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator. Ground Zero | t 22:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose The guideline goes on to say "as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one". As far as I can tell, there is not a single reliable source using the suggested title. The examples given in the guideline, (Time, Kiss, Asus, Realtor) differ in that regard. There has to be an element of common sense in applying the manual style, which notes that there are obvious common sense exceptions. --Yaksar (let's chat) 01:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose, books and scholar use TRANSFAC Gregkaye ✍ ♪  09:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.