Talk:T Choithram International SA v Pagarani

Marriage to second wife
There has been some troubling editing on this article. When I wrote the original article I used the phrase that the deceased went through a "ceremony of marriage" with his second wife, and inserted a footnote to the effect that the original claimants had argued originally that this second marraige was invalid under the lex loci celebrationis, although they had lost the point at first instance and had not appealed it. This appears in the case reports. However, this material has now been removed three times. I reverted it the first two time (each time from an anonymous IP address and without explanation), but I cannot revert it a third time without breaking the 3RR. Accordingly, I will allow some pause for thought and then put some alternative phraseology in (although the point is not central to the case). However, I find this sort of lightweight POV editing troubling, and I am guessing that there is a breach of the rules on WP:COI going on. --Legis (talk - contribs) 13:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * After a lengthy cooling off period, I have reinstated this using more neutrel language. --Legis (talk - contribs) 18:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)