Talk:Table-oriented programming

Hoax?
- a blast from the past. You looked into this in the deletion discussion in 2006. I just declined a G4 speedy on this because it's substantially different from the deleted version, but if this subject isn't a thing... Girth Summit  (blether) 11:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi!
 * Thanks for declining the speedy.
 * I was wondering if inclusion in Wikipedia would be reconsidered in light of the historical section (which I doubt was present on the previous edition, though I'm happy to be proved wrong); I was hoping that the historical section would indicate greater notability than previously assumed.
 * My opinion is that, regardless of the name used, the subject of the article is a thing. I'd be happy with a "rename" (or even merge) consensus, but thought that, whether the name is right or not, at least the page content should be retained.
 * The reason I chose this name is because, although it's not widely used, I think it's the most accurate.
 * If I haven't followed correct process, apologies; the text on recreating a deleted page said that if the content were significantly different than previously included, I was to go ahead.
 * Thanks!   --TimNelson (talk) 22:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)