Talk:Tabley House/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Initial comments
Yesterday I had a quick read of the article and my first impressions were that this was a good article. I tweaked the grammer of the WP:Lead a bit and added a couple or so of wiklinks.

I'm now going to work my way through the article section by section, but leaving the lead until last. I may fix any minor problems as I go, so I will only be highlighting any "problems" that I can't or won't fix. Pyrotec (talk) 10:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations, another "Cheshire" GA. Pyrotec (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)