Talk:Tabloid Junkie/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made a number of copy-edits to correct elementary grammatical mistakes, spelling, readability and style. Please consider enlisting help for copy-editing before nominating articles at WP:GAN.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All online sources are live., properly formatted, substantiate the statements and appear to be reliable sources.


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficeint coverage of the subject and focussed on it.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, this ticks all the boxes, so I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations. But remember to get articles copy-edited before submitting them. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, this ticks all the boxes, so I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations. But remember to get articles copy-edited before submitting them. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)