Talk:Taiwanese wave

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Taiwan F4's poster attached to Hoa Hoc Tro Magazine (Vietnam).jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Images of Taiwanese idols, attached to Hoa Hoc Tro Magazine (Vietnam).jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Images of Taiwanese idols, on cover page of Dat Mui Cuoi Tuan Magazine (Vietnam).jpg

Redirect
This article should be redirected to Cinema of Taiwan. It's literally the same topic, and the article right now is filled with unverified material and most likely written by someone who most likely weren't impartial when writing it. Should I even begin with the dubious Vietnamese sources? Like I can read Vietnamese, and if it was in English it would immediately fail as a reliable source. 202.143.110.37 (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This topic isnt covered at all at Cinema of Taiwan, its not even mentioned once. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 06:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * A subsection can be added over this supposed "wave". I don't see how a standalone article merits any standing. It's hardly comparable to Korean wave, and the user who created this was like I said, impartial. The article creator's username is literally named "TaiwaneseWaveVN" for a start. The term "台流" doesn't even translate to Taiwanese wave. You can't force a cultural phenomenon that just isn't notable. 202.143.110.37 (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * In order to merge it a section would need to already exist at the target. If no suitable redirect target exists and you feel it isn't notable then nominating it for deletion would be the preferred path. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 07:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Is this even relevant anymore?
I think the lack of new sources can be taken a source that this is antiquated information, I mean 'soon' for something that came out almost 15 years ago. 158.140.180.89 (talk) 12:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)