Talk:Takaharu Tezuka

Contested deletion
Speedy deletion nomination of Takaharu Tezuka==

A tag has been placed on Takaharu Tezuka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 153.160.168.118 (talk) 03:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC) ==

Speedy deletion nomination of Takaharu Tezuka


A tag has been placed on Takaharu Tezuka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 153.160.168.118 (talk) 03:29, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because there is no promotional factor within the article but only factual information. Please do let me know which part of the article can be the reason of deletion then I will edit it in due course. Sorry but this is the first time to edit Wikipedia and it will be great if you could kindly let me know.

Response to contestion
Admin and other editors,

Article has been speedy deleted once before in which the author made attempts to remove speedy delete tags and otherwise impede the process. I am no expert in sockpuppetry, but it seems to be a case of that here. Imho, this author in no way should be considered to be acting in good faith, has a clear, close connection (if not autobiographical). Very promotional and probably nn, on most measures.

Sorry if that's a little winded, end of my day here. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Ipigott (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

This is the beginning of a biography of a competent Japanese architect who has won many awards and is gaining wide recognition. In my opinion, the text is not promotional. Therefore: Keep.--Ipigott (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

This article should not be speedy deleted because...
I honestly don't see any promotional text on this page. The information written is mere fact. As an architectural student, I find this page very useful to my research and deleting it would be a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cubic21 (talk • contribs) 10:42, 24 October 2013 (UTC)