Talk:Takayuki Ikeda

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's a bad idea to delete stubs; they could one day become very long articles no matter how short they are. &mdash; Pdiddyjr (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't consider your argument as having the needed weight -- "It shouldn't be deleted because it's a bad idea to delete it because someday it could be something better" is hardly solid. If it is deemed deletable, it can be recreated if and when the subject becomes notable enough to have a proper article.


 * In this case, after the changed I have made, I am not entirely convinced it falls under CSD A7, but in its current state, it is unlikely to pass any kind of PROD or AfD. Pdiddyjr, I believe if some research is done to find information about the subject, further than some game credits and a business profile, this article may have some value. Keep looking! :)

Salvidrim (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I do not think this subject is notable enough, with this little information the page should be deleted.Meatsgains (talk) 19:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah but don't demolish the house while it's still being built.Pdiddyjr (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Don't build the house until you have the proper material to make it worth building! Salvidrim (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Case Closed!Pdiddyjr (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)