Talk:Takeshima Islands


 * ''There should be no further discussions on this page. All discussion belongs on Talk:Liancourt Rocks. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 16:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Why can User:Zonath erase all sentences with no explanations?
-- &rArr; Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC) -- &rArr; Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC) -- &rArr; Shougiku Wine 15:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Why can User:Zonath erase all the articles of Takeshima Islands with no explanations and redirect to that one-sided Dokdo page in qustion?
 * User:Zonath, why can't you recognize that the articles of Takeshima Islands are completely different from the too-self-satisfied Koreans' articles of Dokdo?
 * User:Zonath,why can't you see the one-sided-unfair articles of Dokdo having problems now?

Don't redirect this page to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo"
Don' redirect this page "Takeshima Island" to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo". See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath). -- &rArr; Shougiku Wine 16:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

-- &rArr; Shougiku Wine  21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Second Alert: See the discussion page of "Takeshima Islands" and "Dokdo" and answer (for User:Zonath).
 * I've seen the page, and it's not worth posting a reply to your POV rantings. You;re so blinded by your own POV that you can't see the fact that there are a small number of editors trying to work out a NPOV that is fair to both (all?) sides in this dispute. People acting the way you're acting are only causing difficulties toward this end. If you don't like the neutral stance of Wikipedia, you are encouraged to go make your own POV wiki somewhere else. You have to maintain a neutral POV when editing articles here. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

-- &rArr; Shougiku Wine  21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Third Alert:Why do Koreans e.g.User:Nihonjoe wanna to redirect to one-sided-unfair page "Dokdo"? You haven't answer anything yet. It's like putting the cart before the horse. It's clear that Koreans e.g.User:Zonath), User:Nihonjoe and so on are cunning vandalists.
 * No, I'm more of a cunning linguist. (^_-). "Dokdo" is the title that was decided upon after a very lengthy discussion on the associated Talk pages. It only makes sense since South Korean is currently in political, economic, and physical control of the islets. Besides, it doesn't really matter what the title of the article is if all of the sides in the dispute are represented by the text of the article. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

-- &rArr; Shougiku Wine  21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Forth Alert: Why do not Koreans like User:Zonath), User:Nihonjoe and so on answer the questions?
 * Perhaps because your questions are so absurd as to not generally be worth an answer? You aren't even remotely attempting to find neutral ground here. You even make accusations that you can't back up. As I've already told you, I'm about as Korean as Tony Blair. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

-- &rArr; Shougiku Wine  21:10, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Fifth Alert: Why do Koreans like User:Zonath), User:Nihonjoe and so on ignore objective discussion?
 * This is too rich. You're so blinded by your own POV that anyone who is actually working toward a neutral POV is seen as unobjective by you. Please grow up and learn to act like an adult. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  15:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)